Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

9 Lies Republicans Tell About Women's Bodies

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 9 Lies Republicans Tell About Women's Bodies

    So i found this little gem on Huffington Post while at work. I feel that the media has gone full retard.



    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/0...ef=mostpopular

    Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) apologized Tuesday to Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.) for accusing her of lying about the gender breakdown of a contraception hearing panel, but plenty of real lies remain in the debate over women's health. Some are promoted by Republican lawmakers as they push legislation that limits reproductive rights, and others come from GOP presidential candidates and their surrogates.

    1. Birth Control Causes Prostate Cancer.

    Last month a New Hampshire lawmaker came up with a new reason the government should not require health insurance companies to provide contraception.

    "As a man, would it interest you to know that Dr. Brownstein just published an article that links the pill to prostate cancer?” state Rep. Jeanine Notter (R) asked a male representative at the hearing, the Merrimack Patch reports.

    "In the children that are born from these women?" he asked. Notter could not clearly explain the study or how the pill results in prostate cancer.

    The study described in the newsletter of Dr. David Brownstein, a physician and holistic practitioner in Michigan, suggests men may ingest estrogen through environmental contamination, not in utero from mothers taking birth control. An author of the study told ABC News, "This is just a hypothesis-generating idea. Women should not be throwing away the pill because of this."

    2. Abortion Causes Breast Cancer.

    The New Hampshire House recently passed a bill that would require doctors to tell women seeking abortions that the procedure can cause breast cancer. Here is an excerpt from the bill, sponsored by Notter:

    Materials that inform the pregnant woman that there is a direct link between abortion and breast cancer. It is scientifically undisputed that full-term pregnancy reduces a woman’s lifetime risk of breast cancer. It is also undisputed that the earlier a woman has a first full-term pregnancy, the lower her risk of breast cancer becomes, because following a full-term pregnancy the breast tissue exposed to estrogen through the menstrual cycle is more mature and cancer resistant. In fact, for each year that a woman’s first full-term pregnancy is delayed, her risk of breast cancer rises 3.5 percent. The theory that there is a direct link between abortion and breast cancer builds upon this undisputed foundation. During the first and second trimesters of pregnancy the breasts develop merely by duplicating immature tissues. Once a woman passes the thirty-second week of pregnancy (third trimester), the immature cells develop into mature cancer resistant cells. When an abortion ends a normal pregnancy, the woman is left with more immature breast tissue than she had before she was pregnant.
    There is no link between abortions and breast cancer, according to the World Health Organization, the American Cancer Society and other major health organizations. Similar provisions requiring doctors to make the abortion-breast cancer connection remain on the books in other state laws. Alaska, Kansas, Mississippi, Oklahoma, Texas all inaccurately assert a risk in written counseling materials, according to the Guttmacher Institute, a New York-based reproductive health research organization.

    3. Birth Control Is A Sex Pill.

    Rush Limbaugh showed he has no understanding of how birth control pills work when he attacked Sandra Fluke, a Georgetown law student barred from testifying as a Democratic witness at a congressional hearing about the Obama administration's contraception policy. Limbaugh called Fluke a “slut” for needing lots of birth control to manage her sex life.

    “She wants to be paid to have sex,” Limbaugh said. “She's having so much sex she can't afford the contraception. She wants you and me and the taxpayers to pay her to have sex.”

    Rick Santorum has also said that contraception encourages a bad kind of sex. Last year, in an interview with the Evangelical blog Caffeinated Thoughts, Santorum warned of the "dangers of contraception:"

    "It’s not OK because it’s a license to do things in the sexual realm that is counter to how things are supposed to be. They’re supposed to be within marriage, they are supposed to be for purposes that are, yes, conjugal, but also [inaudible], but also procreative. That’s the perfect way that a sexual union should happen. We take any part of that out, we diminish the act."
    Most women who have had sex have used contraception. Birth control pills -- which are taken daily, regardless of how frequently a woman has sex -- may also be taken to manage endometriosis, ovarian cysts, acne or other health problems. A recent bill in Arizona proposed penalizing women who use the pill for non-medical reasons.

    4. Abortion Industry Is “Selling Abortions.”

    A Republican state legislator in Arizona last week wrote in an email to a constituent that she wanted to force women seeking abortions to watch the procedure first.

    "Personally I'd like to make a law that mandates a woman watch an abortion being performed prior to having a 'surgical procedure,'" state Rep. Terri Proud (R) wrote. The constituent responded by email that she was "speechless" and after a baffling exchange with Proud, released the emails to the media. Facing national outrage, Proud issued a statement:

    For too long, Planned Parenthood and the abortion industry have placed selling abortions above the health and safety of women. My message to a constituent last week emphasized my concerns with how abortion providers have not been honest with women about the realities of abortion, and the short and long-term risks of this dangerous surgical procedure.
    The notion that Planned Parenthood baits women into unwanted pregnancies by providing ineffective contraception then profits off the abortions is nothing new, but it's as outrageous as it sounds. Abortions constitute 3 percent of Planned Parenthood's services, and the organization estimates it prevents more than 220,000 abortions each year by providing contraception. Because Planned Parenthood is not allowed to use federal funds for abortions, defunding the program may limit contraception services and result in more abortions.

    5. Women Can't Get Pregnant From Rape.

    Just before Idaho's Senate passed a mandatory ultrasound bill last week, bill sponsor made some startling comments about abortion and rape.

    "Rape and incest was used as a reason to oppose this," said state Sen. Chuck Winder (R). "I would hope that when a woman goes in to a physician with a rape issue, that physician will indeed ask her about perhaps her marriage, was this pregnancy caused by normal relations in a marriage or was it truly caused by a rape. I assume that's part of the counseling that goes on.”

    It wasn't the first time a lawmaker has suggested that women seeking abortions may lie about rape. Some anti-abortion activists actually believe that rape cannot result in pregnancy. Buzzfeed dug up a series of bizarre statements Republicans have made about pregnancy, rape, juices not flowing and more. Here's one:

    The odds that a woman who is raped will get pregnant are "one in millions and millions and millions," said state Rep. Stephen Freind, R-Delaware County, the Legislature's leading abortion foe.
    The reason, Freind said, is that the traumatic experience of rape causes a woman to "secrete a certain secretion" that tends to kill sperm.

    Two Philadelphia doctors specializing in human reproduction characterized Freind's contention as scientifically baseless.

    According to Planned Parenthood, about 5 percent of rapes result in pregnancy, and providing all rape victims with emergency contraception could prevent more than 22,000 unwanted pregnancies a year.

    6. Prenatal Testing Leads To Abortion.

    Rick Santorum made prenatal testing a campaign issue last month when he declared the tests are designed to "cull the ranks of the disabled in our society" by encouraging abortions.

    “Amniocentesis does, in fact, result more often than not in this country in abortions,” Santorum, who has a severely disabled daughter, said on Face the Nation. “That is a fact.”

    In fact, more than 90 percent of amniocenteses tests result in normal diagnoses, and half of fetuses diagnosed with severe abnormalities -- about 5 percent of those tested -- are aborted, according to PolitiFact.

    A campaign spokeswoman for Obama condemned Santorum's comments as "misinformed and dangerous" and pointed out that the tests help women have safer deliveries and healthier babies.

    7. HPV Vaccine Causes Retardation.

    Back when Rick Perry was campaigning for president, his rivals attacked him for signing an executive order mandating the human papillomavirus vaccine for young girls, and misinformation quickly spread. Michele Bachmann insinuated that the vaccine causes mental retardation, while Santorum spoke out against "having little girls inoculated at the force and compulsion of the government."

    The vaccine is safe and effective in preventing cervical cancer caused by certain strains of HPV, and Perry's 2007 executive order, which was overturned by the state legislature, would have allowed parents to opt out of having their daughters vaccinated. Dr. Renata Arrington-Sanders, a professor at Johns Hopkins University medical school, told HuffPost's Laura Bassett:

    "The HPV vaccine has been shown to be safe and well-tolerated based on multiple medical reports that have been submitted through government databases. It's unfortunate that this particular vaccine is surrounded by a lot of controversy just because it's been labeled as an STD-prevention vaccine. We have similar vaccines, such as one for hepatitis B, that are also used in a mandated approach and have shown very successful rates with prevention."
    8. Plan B Causes Abortions.

    The debate over the Obama administration's contraception policy has yielded some puzzling claims about birth control and Plan B. House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) addressed the House in February, urging his colleagues to reverse Obama's mandate for health insurance coverage of "abortion-inducing drugs:"

    In recent days, Americans of every faith and political persuasion have mobilized in objection to a rule put forward by the Obama administration that constitutes an unambiguous attack on religious freedom in our country. This rule would require faith-based employers –- including Catholic charities, schools, universities, and hospitals -– to provide services they believe are immoral. Those services include sterilization, abortion-inducing drugs and devices, and contraception.
    Michele Bachmann called Plan B an abortion pill when she incorrectly criticized Obama for making the drug available over-the-counter -- an FDA recommendation the administration and Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius rejected last year. "The president can put abortion pills for girls 8 years of age, 11 years of age, on the bubblegum aisle," Bachmann said at a "pro-life" town hall in December.

    Contraceptives, emergency or not, prevent pregnancy. They don't cause abortions. Plan B works in the same way and with the same ingredients as birth control pills, just at a higher dosage, and does nothing to stop the development of a fetus.

    9. Your Fetus Is Just Fine.

    The Arizona Senate passed a bill this month to protect doctors from "wrongful birth" lawsuits -- effectively allowing them to withhold information that may lead a patient to get an abortion. HuffPost's John Celock reports:

    Sen. Nancy Barto (R-Phoenix) told the Claims Journal that she sponsored the law because she did not want claimants to blame a doctor for a baby born with disabilities. Under the provisions of her bill, a doctor could not be sued for medical malpractice if the doctor withholds information from a mother about a child's potential health issues that could influence her decision to have an abortion. In addition, a lawsuit could not be filed on the child's behalf regarding a disability.
    Sergeant Sergeant Master Sergeant Shooter Person

    MS Paint " Its like painting with a sauce covered piece of pasta".

    Official In Crowd member.

  • #2
    I feel like everyone in politics these days have gone full retard including the media.

    Republicans aren't winning hearts and minds, regardless of the propaganda they and others spew about them.
    sigpic
    Official Space Shuttle Door Gunner of the Chechnyan Space Program

    Comment


    • #3
      ugh.
      mrs. heavymetal from jeepforum
      2022 JL Rubicon

      Originally posted by hoggie101
      and everyone qute dis because its the best grammer im going to have all year

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Buffalo Phil View Post
        including the media.
        The media went full retard a long time ago.
        Molten Motorsports - #4343/4443

        Comment


        • #5
          Did the whole seperation of Church and State just get thrown out the window? Ya know thw whole sex after marriage thing.

          The way I see it, the Rupublicans have an `in` and they`re fucking it up so bad.
          I don't always drink orange juice, but when I do, I prefer to chew it. #madpulp

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by ninetysix-ex-jay View Post
            Did the whole seperation of Church and State just get thrown out the window? Ya know thw whole sex after marriage thing.

            The way I see it, the Rupublicans have an `in` and they`re fucking it up so bad.
            Agreed.... It's like the GOP WANTS to lose to Obama.... and the Media has always wanted Obama to win (except Fox, they want White-Obama = Romney).

            This whole dam•nation is going full retard....
            Shane "The Bag" Carlson

            2.5L TJ, 5-speed, frankenlift, and stuff.
            My "Bucket" Build
            MilitaryJeepers.com
            ‚——P--;===±--= <-
            !‚–’¯ƒ¹¶

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by bucketokarma View Post
              Agreed.... It's like the GOP WANTS to lose to Obama.... and the Media has always wanted Obama to win (except Fox, they want White-Obama = Romney).

              This whole dam•nation is going full retard....
              As much as I dislike Romney, he has the best shot out of the 4 to beat Obama.

              Comment


              • #8
                but he would be no different than Obama, and we run the chance (very high chance) of being stuck with him for eight years. At least with Obama, we know we can get rid of him in four.

                Besides, Ron Paul is the only one taking voters from Obama, has the independents, and a large portion of republicans. Nobody else is taking voters away from Obama like Ron Paul. If the GOP and Fox got behind Ron Paul, he would win BY A LANDSLIDE. If Ron Paul isn't on the ticket, all those "former" Obama supporters, will go right back to Obama. Obama will win again. Romney has the best chances of winning the GOP nomination, but Ron Paul has the best chances of beating Obama. Even IF Romney does beat Obama, will it be any different? Clinton=Bush=Obama=Romney..... continue the cycle, keep the status quo.

                A vote for Santorum = a vote for Obama
                A vote for Gingrich = a vote for Obama
                A vote for Romney = a vote for Obomney

                A vote for Ron Paul = votes being taken away from Obama

                The math is there, even if the media and the GOP isn't.
                Shane "The Bag" Carlson

                2.5L TJ, 5-speed, frankenlift, and stuff.
                My "Bucket" Build
                MilitaryJeepers.com
                ‚——P--;===±--= <-
                !‚–’¯ƒ¹¶

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by bucketokarma View Post
                  but he would be no different than Obama, and we run the chance (very high chance) of being stuck with him for eight years. At least with Obama, we know we can get rid of him in four.

                  Besides, Ron Paul is the only one taking voters from Obama, has the independents, and a large portion of republicans. Nobody else is taking voters away from Obama like Ron Paul. If the GOP and Fox got behind Ron Paul, he would win BY A LANDSLIDE. If Ron Paul isn't on the ticket, all those "former" Obama supporters, will go right back to Obama. Obama will win again. Romney has the best chances of winning the GOP nomination, but Ron Paul has the best chances of beating Obama. Even IF Romney does beat Obama, will it be any different? Clinton=Bush=Obama=Romney..... continue the cycle, keep the status quo.

                  A vote for Santorum = a vote for Obama
                  A vote for Gingrich = a vote for Obama
                  A vote for Romney = a vote for Obomney

                  A vote for Ron Paul = votes being taken away from Obama

                  The math is there, even if the media and the GOP isn't.
                  Why is there a high chance that you're stuck with Romney for 8 years? Maybe he'll turn out ok, which means he might deserve another term, or if he sucks then you can vote him out. Makes sense just to focus on the next 4 for now.

                  How is Paul taking voters away from Obama? He's only gotten 5% of the Republican primary vote (wouldn't call that a large portion). Recent polls show that Romney would fare the best vs Obama out of the 4. (43% vs 39.4% for Paul).

                  Don't get me wrong, I think Santorum and Gingrich are imbeciles and Romney is generally out of touch with American society. Paul has some good ideas, but most of them are unfeasible in modern society.

                  In the end, will anything change? Probably not, but that's not the fault of the President, its the fault of Congress. If you want American society to change, vote out every incumbent Congressman in every election until there are none left were serving today.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    i think where ron paul will gain obama supporters and middle of the road type people, he looses the ultra conservative. Believe it or not, it cancels out.

                    I would be stunned to see someone other than barrack obama in the white house come this time next year.

                    This nation's problems are REAL, its time for republicans to stop being stuck up dicks and democrats to stop being stupid. And TRY, for the love of god, please TRY to work together to help or solve or fix something!!! For god sake, this nation will crumble before these stubborn douchenuckles can look past themselves for 12 seconds and focus on the needs of the people.

                    We need relief at the pumps, we need to address healthcare issues, we need to figure out what the fuck we are doing with our wars, we need innovation, and we need growth.

                    We don't need to be fighting over issues like abortion rights, having premarital sex, gay marriage.... WTF!!!! the priorities of these people are fucking retarded. We live in a free society, take away your personal bias' and read the constitution, then read the declaration, then do some thinking; the answer to those "problems" is pretty fucking clear. MOVE THE FUCK ON. I want to hear about relevant and pressing issues, i want to hear about solutions, i want to hear about ideas on how to restore this nation. Something these candidates and every fuckhead in washington is failing to do.

                    Nick, you're too right. The real issue isn't the president, it's the dumb fucks in the house and the senate.
                    No worries, I'm not actually back, I'm just reminiscing about the old days.


                    ForSure Motorsports
                    Win or Lose, We Booze.


                    Vice President of Internal Affairs at Dirty Donny's House of Hookers

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      TERM LIMITS FOR CONGRESSMEN. FOUR TERMS IN THE HOUSE AND 2 TERMS IN THE SENATE AND GTFO!!!
                      No worries, I'm not actually back, I'm just reminiscing about the old days.


                      ForSure Motorsports
                      Win or Lose, We Booze.


                      Vice President of Internal Affairs at Dirty Donny's House of Hookers

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        While I agree that the real issues are taking a backseat to trivial nonsense. The dollar is falling (even though it's having a small "surge" right now). Gas prices aren't going up when compared to silver, in fact they are going down if you use silver as currency.

                        Both sides are about bigger government control over the people and more money from their corporate sponsors. Congress is a huge problem, I also agree there, but where I disagree, is that the president isn't a problem, or that he has no power. The president has the power to VETO things like the Patriot Act and the Trespassing Act (restricting out 1st amendment rights even further) as well as send the NDAA back to get fixed before signing. The president also PERSONALLY has the power to call back ALL of our military forces from operations that are not only costing trillions of dollars as well as the respect of the world. Sure, we are feared, but we aren't respected, and that opens us up to more attacks from outside (not that we need to worry about outside forces attacking us, we have our government to terrorize us in the name of "safety").

                        Yes, I do feel that when reps get sent to DC, they lose sight of the people that are supposed to be representing and only concern themselves with the groups that will provide the biggest payout to them.

                        More than anything, they need to balance their checkbook and stop paying off their debt with our credit. You can't print your way out of debt, if you could, we all would be doing it.

                        Let me live my life as I see fit and I'll let you live yours; what's wrong with that? It would work fine in this day and age. Don't say that the times are changing and we need to change with the times and that's why more government control on our lives is needed. It always turns out the same. If history has taught us anything, it's that we never learn from the lessons of history. Anything given to you by the government was taken from someone else, and the government does NOT know how to spend MY MONEY (or the fruits of MY labors) better that I DO! Say it's for our own good, say it's for safety and protection, say whatever you want, but I would rather be free to die defending my neighbor's liberty, than be forced to live in complete safety without the freedom to choose how I live and die.

                        Anyone that has ever respected the 2nd amendment, should NOT be fooled into thinking that Romney would protect that right (or any other rights after his defense of the Patriot Act and the 2012 NDAA, as well as the AWB and other gun control laws he signed or was in favor of).
                        Let's get back to a nation that uses the constitution as a tool to RESTRICT our government not the government's tool to revoke our freedoms.
                        Shane "The Bag" Carlson

                        2.5L TJ, 5-speed, frankenlift, and stuff.
                        My "Bucket" Build
                        MilitaryJeepers.com
                        ‚——P--;===±--= <-
                        !‚–’¯ƒ¹¶

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          I agree with Matt about term limits for Congressmen

                          As far as a weak dollar is concerned, its a driver of domestic economic growth. A weak dollar increases domestic exports and increases domestic consumption of domestic goods. Also, since the value of the dollar is more or less driven by interest rates, a weak dollar means a low interest rate environment which is necessary for investment and growth.

                          The price of oil will be an issue come summertime if things haven't changed, but, any sort of enthusiasm into US natural gas production will soon make OPEC generally irrelevant.

                          To be honest with you, I haven't experienced any real lessening of freedoms in my life. I don't see how Romney is against the 2nd amendment, you're allowed to own a firearm in Massachusetts.

                          The Constitution shouldn't be used as a rigid guideline, but rather something to interpret based on the current societal context in which it is read. A lot has changed since 1787.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Nick View Post

                            To be honest with you, I haven't experienced any real lessening of freedoms in my life. I don't see how Romney is against the 2nd amendment, you're allowed to own a firearm in Massachusetts.
                            It goes much much deeper than that. The fact that any CT or RI resident can serve one year manditory in prison for the possession of a handgun in MA is pretty absurd. Don't have the paperwork from MA to have it? One year in prison. Traveling to VT from CT with a handgun without the gun registered in MA? One year. The state doesn't much care for FOPA, you don't jump through their hoops, you're fucked. In fact, it's the same with NY as well. I cannot leave CT with my handgun unless I have the paperwork to own the gun in NY and MA, and NY is one of the hardest states to get a RESIDENT permit in, let alone a non-resident. MA is a very hostile state when it comes to firearms laws as well and it's easy to see when you're in the industry. A gun can be completely legal to own in CT yet be illegal to own in MA, same with every state in New Englad. In fact, the magazines that I own are illegal in MA and possession of those magazines can land with with a huge fine. I used to own an HK G3when I lived in PA and I was about to build it and assemble the entire parts kit into the action, but I couldn't take it home to CT because it was banned by name.

                            Many people in my industry are big one issue voters for this reason because while it's not a super hot topic, some laws can make or break your company or force you to leave the state you started in a open shop somewhere else.
                            Last edited by Buffalo Phil; 03-31-2012, 12:34 PM.
                            sigpic
                            Official Space Shuttle Door Gunner of the Chechnyan Space Program

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              I get where you're coming from regarding that, and that's one of the problems with all the different gun control laws, they're often vague and quite different from place to place. A more codified version, applied to bigger regional areas, would make it easier for everyone living there to comply with the laws.

                              I'm a supporter of the idea that everyone, who is legally competent to own a firearm, should be able to do so. But at the same time, its something that needs regulation.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X