Obama is going to use children as leverage

[Buffalo Phil]

The entire anti-gun platform is dancing in the blood of the deceased children to push their political agenda that guns are objects used only by foreign and domestic terrorists. I have never in my life seen such knee jerk lunacy.

We are slowly accepting the fact that our government is getting deeper and deeper into our personal lives and we openly accept it for the greater good. Those who would sacrifice liberty for personal security deserve neither.

[HeavyMetal]

The concept of your argument, Hux, is completely flawed in the sense that you are defending mindless government legislature, for the sake of just (attempting to) troll me.

Get your shit together and let me know when you plan to use realistic logic (not to mention facts)

[Lumbergh]

Still confused how the children are safer with 23 less rounds in the magazine.

[Buffalo Phil]

Still confused how the children are safer with 23 less rounds in the magazine.

Actually, in New York, it's 3 less rounds. There has been a 10 round magazine capacity limit in New York since 1994 unless you own preban magazines.

[HeavyMetal]

Still confused how the children are safer with 23 less rounds in the magazine.

Ask the VA tech shooter how magazine laws make everyone safe.

[Lumbergh]

so less rounds in the mag the safer it is to point the gun at other people?

[Buffalo Phil]

If you are a New York politician, yes.

[Ruepart Hoaxley]

The concept of your argument, Hux, is completely flawed in the sense that you are defending mindless government legislature, for the sake of just (attempting to) troll me.

Get your shit together and let me know when you plan to use realistic logic (not to mention facts)

I'm not defending it at all. Where in anything I've said did I say "The government is right and we need this legislation"?

My logic is fine. You're arguing in circles for the sake of arguing in circles. Okay, you win.

[HeavyMetal]

My logic is fine. You're arguing in circles for the sake of arguing in circles. Okay, you win.

Your logic isnt fine, because you are making up what common U.S house holds use, and you still dont fundamentally understand how common a 7+ round pistol is . A desert Eagle is your example of a 7+ round pistol? LOL, fire up call of duty

Where has my argument gone in a circle?

[Ruepart Hoaxley]

[HeavyMetal]

broken link is broken.

what this all boils down to is what phil said

this isnt about safety, it is about control. the sooner people realize that and get off the emotional high, the better off we will be.

our government isnt stupid, they know this doesnt make us safer. So what other reason would they have? It is for control, which will slowly gain steam over time as long as it is allowed to.

There will be more mass shootings. ALWAYS. There will be more legislation. If you dont see the writing on the wall, get better glasses

[Lumbergh]

uhh there's no rounds in the magazine sir I don't see the problem...

[HeavyMetal]

My next pistol will be belt fed.

[hoggie101]

uhh there's no rounds in the magazine sir I don't see the problem...

oh wow is that going to be the loop hole we all go though? because its not a accepting a box magazine its accepting a belt

[Ruepart Hoaxley]