hey joshua. nice to have you on the forum.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Hi everyone
Collapse
X
-
Welcome, good sirOriginally posted by Fast Orangeif you piss all over the floor and get 3 drops in the bowl do you count that as good? granted i'm good for a sprinkle or two on the seat, but you leave all of our feet wet, metaphorically speaking of courseOriginally posted by HitItWithSomeSpeedI find adam sandler strangely attractive, it must be josh's fault. god that kid sucks
Comment
-
did I meet you at the sycamore?Last edited by wannabejeep; 07-16-2009, 12:58 AM.1993 XJ sport 3.5" rustys 33" MTZ's armored.
1999 sierra
1967 M725 Big and Slow
-Dan
Comment
-
In response to your question i have made a formula for it: Using the formula: (W + I) * C where W = the constant of wood, which is well known to be 61, as agreed in many scientific circles. I = the variable in this equation, and stands for the word "if" from the original problem. As there are three circumstances, with 0 equaling the chance that the woodchuck cannot chuck wood, 1 being the theory that the woodchuck can chuck wood but chooses not to, and 2 standing for the probability that the woodchuck can and will chuck wood, we clearly must choose 2 for use in this equation. C = the constant of Chuck Norris, whose presence in any problem involving the word chuck must there, is well known to equal 1.1 of any known being, therefore the final part of this calculation is 1.1. As is clear, this appears to give the answer of (61 + 2) * 1.1 = (63) * 1.1 = 69.3. However, Chuck Norris' awesome roundhouse kick declares that all decimal points cannot be used in formulas such as this, and so it must be rounded to the final solution of 69 units of wood.Originally posted by Ktmracer419 View PostHow much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?
Comment
-




Vice President of Internal Affairs at Dirty Donny's House of Hookers
Comment